HAFTŌRANG

HAFTŌRANG, the circumpolar constellation Ursa Major (UMa) was already known in Young Avestan literature under the appellative of haptōiriṇga- (only pl. with star-, m., “star”), a Bahuvrīhi compound (Duchesne-Guillemin, p. 177, 215) probably signifying “having seven signs,” as assumed by Bartholomae (col. 1767; cf. Justi, p. 320; out of date Spiegel, p. 533) with reference to Skt. liṅga- (“mark, spot, sign” etc.). Although Filliozat (p. 326) contested this comparison because liṅga- is attested only in Classical Skt., the existence of an OIr. stem *ringa- can be assumed on account of Man. Sogd. pring [prʾynk] (damask; cf. Man. M-P. pring [pryng], Pahlavi and Mod. Persian parand), which derives from O.Ir. *upa-ringa- (marked, figured), as shown by Henning (“TPS,” 1945, pp. 150-57 = SP, 2, pp. 259-66; Gharib, p. 281).

The identification of Av. Haptōiriṇga with UMa is correct (Khareghat, p. 123), as the Pahlavi and Persian sources confirm, while that with the Pleiades, advanced by Hertel (1931, p. 77; 1936, p. 11) is untenable. The representation of UMa as a constellation of seven stars is attested (e.g. in Vedic literature: sapta-rṣáyaḥ “the Seven Wises Men”), but older and more common in RV is the name ṛ́kṣāḥ (“[the Seven] Bears”; see Khot. haudariṃcha- “the Seven Bears,” Bailey, p. 498; Cane-vascini, p. 132, n. 66, 285; Qing, pp. 81, 131). For other names and identifications (“Wagon,” “Bear(s),” etc.) in antiquity, see Scherer, pp. 131-40, 178 and passim; Göss-mann, pp. 95-97, n. 258; Allen, pp. 419-47; Duchesne-Guillemin, 1986, p. 237; Reiner, pp. 56-58).

The Haptōiriṇga-stars are only mentioned in the Yašt-literature and in the two Sīh Rōzags (Bartholomae, col. 1767; Khareghat, pp. 122-23; Gray, p. 149), where they are called (Yt. 12, 28; S. 1, 13; 2, 13) bāešaziia- (healing), mazdaδāta- (created [or “given”] by Mazdā), xᵛarə-naŋᵛhaṇt-xᵛarənah-endowed” (see FARNAH), and are worshipped with Tištrya (Sirius) and other minor Av. stars or constellations “so as to oppose the Yātus and the Pairikās” (Yt. 8, 12; Panaino, 1990, I, pp. 38, 104-7; idem, 1989, pp. 22-23). Their relationship with the stargod Sirius is confirmed by the fact that these stars are worshipped in the Sīh Rōzag litany specifically on the day (n. 13) dedicated to Tištrya (Hartman, p. 45). According to Yt. 13, 60, they are watched over by 99,999 Frauuaṧis.

In Pahlavi literature Haftōring [hp̄tw(k)lng] is the General of the North (Ir. and Ind. Bundahišn, II, 7; Henning, 1942, p. 231) and opposes the planet Ohrmazd (Jupiter; Ir.Bd., V, 4; MacKenzie, p. 513) or the planet Wahrām (Mars; Škand-gumānīg Wizār, IV, 32-33; see de Menasce, pp. 52, 53; but a Pāzand variant in the ŠGW (IV, 31) opposes Kēwān (Saturn) to Haftōring, cf. de Menasce, pp. 52, 54 in note; Eilers, 1967, p. 133). According to the Mēnōg ī Xrad, XLIX, 15-21 (text: Sanjana, p. 70; trans.: West, 1885, pp. 91-92; Bausani, pp. 155-56) Ursa Major protects and takes control over the regular turning of the twelve zodiacal signs, and it moves around hell (located to the north like Haftōring) controlling its gate to hold back 99,999 demonic beings with the help of the same number of Frawahrs. The kidneys (Pahl. gurdag) are the animal sacrificial portion belonging to Haftōring, according to Šāyest na Šāyest, XI, 4 (cf. Kotwal, pp. 22-23). The name of Haftōring is given a paretymological explanation (haft rag “seven veins”) in Ir. Bundahišn, II, 7; this passage attributes to the stars of the Big Dip-per seven ties each one bound to one of the Kešvars (continents; Henning, 1942, p. 232, n. 6; Panaino, 1996, chps. 4.0., 4.5.). The reading ‘βt’r’nkty (Ursa Major) in a Man. Sogdian fragment remains uncertain (cf. Sims-Williams, p. 61; Sundermann, pp. 30, n. 69, 31, n. 71; Gharib, p. 21).

In New Persian literature Ursa Major is called haft-ōrang, h. varang[-e mehīn] (UMa; H.-e kehīn being UMi); h. owrang (the seven thrones [also h. taḵt]); h. setāra-ḡan (the seven stars); h. barādarān or h. dādarān (the seven brothers); doḵtarān-enaʿš, and the Arabic banāt al-naʿš, or banāt al-naʿš al-kobrā [or al-ṣoġrā] (“the daughters of the Bier” [four of the stars are the bier and the remaining three the daughters]) are also both used; ḵers-e bozorg or dobb-e akbar (the Great Bear; cf. Horn, p. 196; see Dehḵodā, s.v. haft owrang; Eilers, 1976, 13, n. 31; Steingass, pp. 201, 505, 1411, 1503-4; Taqizāda, p. 112).

Bibliography:

Alessandro Bausani, Testi Religiosi Zoroastriani, Catania, 1963.

G. Canevascini, The Khotanese Saṅghāṭasūtra: a critical edition, Wiesbaden, 1993.

Jacques Duchesne-Guillemin, Les Composés de l’Avesta, Liège-Paris, 1936.

Idem, “Origines iraniennes et babyloniennes de la nomenclature astrale,” Académie des Inscriptions et Belles Lettres. Comptes rendus des Séances (CRAI), 1986, pp. 234-50.

Wilhelm Eilers, “Stern-Planet-Regenbogen. Zur Nomenklatur der orientalischen Himmelskunde,” in Der Orient in der Forschung. Festschrift für Otto Spies zum 5. April 1966, ed. W. Hoenerbach, Wiesbaden, 1967, pp. 92-146.

Idem, Sinn und Herkunft der Planetennamen, München, 1976.

Jean Filliozat, “Notes d’astronomie ancienne de l’Iran et de l’Inde (I, II et III),” JA, 250, 1962, pp. 325-50.

F. Gössmann, Planetarium Babylonicum oder die sumerisch-babylonischen Stern-Namen, Rom, 1950.

Louis Herbert Gray, The Foundations of the Iranian Religions, Bombay, 1929.

Sven S. Hartman, “La disposition de l’Avesta,” Orientalia Suecana, 5, (1956) 1957, pp. 30-78.

W. B. Henning, “An Astronomical Chapter of the Bundahishn,” JRAS, 1942, pp. 229-48 [= Selected Papers, Vol. 2, Acta Iranica 15, Téhéran-Liège, 1977, pp. 95-114].

Idem, “Two Central Asian Words,” TPS, 1945, pp. 150-62 [= SP, II, pp. 259-71].

Johannes Hertel, Die awestischen Herrschafts- und Siegesfeuer, Leipzig, 1931.

Idem, Der Planet Venus im Awesta, Leipzig, 1936.

Paul Horn, “Neupersische Schriftsprache,” in Grundriss I, 2, Strassburg, 1898-1901, pp. 1-200.

Ferdinand Justi, Handbuch der Zendsprache, Leipzig, 1864.

Firoze M. P. Kotwal, The Supplementary Texts to the Šāyest na-Šāyest, Copenhagen, 1969.

M. P. Khareghat, “The identity of some heavenly bodies mentioned in the Old Iranian writings,” in Sir Jamsetjee Jejeebhoy Madressa Jubilee Volume, Bombay, 1914, pp. 116-58.

David Neil MacKenzie, “Zoroastrian Astrology in the Bun-dahišn,” BSOAS 27, 1964, pp. 511-29.

P. Jean de Menasce, Škand-Gumānīk vičar. La solution décisive des doutes. Texte pazand-pehlevi traduit et commenté, Fribourg en Suisse, 1945.

Antonio Panaino, “L’inno avestico a Vanant,” Atti del Sodalizio Glottologico Milanese 28, (1987), 1989, pp. 21-30.

Idem, Tištrya. Vol. I. The Avestan Hymn to Sirius, Rome, 1990. Idem, Tištrya. Vol. II. The Iranian Myth of the Star Sirius, Rome, 1995.

Idem, “Uranographia Iranica II. Aves-tan hapta.srū- and mərəzu-: Ursa Minor and the North Pole?” AfO 42-43, 1995-96, pp. 190-207.

Idem, Tes-sere il Cielo, Roma, 1996.

D. Qing, Das Khotanische Aparimitāyuḥsūtra, Reinbek, 1992.

Erica Reiner, Astral Magic in Babylonia, Philadelphia, 1995.

P. Sanjana, The Dînâ î Maînû ī Khrat or The Religious Decision of the Spirit of Wisdom, Bombay, 1895.

A. Scherer, Gestirnnamen bei den indogermanischen Völ-kern, Heidelberg, 1953.

Nicholas Sims-Williams, “The Sogdian Fragment of the British Library,” IIJ, 18, (1976), 1977, pp. 43-82.

Friedrich Spiegel, Commentar über das Avesta, II, Wien, 1869.

Werner Sundermann, The Manichaean Hymn cyclesHuyadagmān and Angad Rōšnānin Parthian and Sogdian, II, London 1990.

Ḥasan Taqizāda, Ḡah-šomarī dar Īrān-ē qadīm, Tehran 1316 Š./1937.

E. W. West, Pahlavi Texts, Part III, Oxford, 1885 (repr., Delhi, 1977).

(Antonio Panaino)

Cite this article: